International Environmental Law in Times of Multilateral Crisis:
Brief Reflections to Global Environmental Governance
Palavras-chave:
International Environmental Law; Global Environmental Governance; Crisis of Multilateralism; Environmental Paradiplomacy; Climate Governance.Resumo
This article examines the evolution of International Environmental Law within the context of the contemporary crisis of multilateralism and the transformation of global governance structures. The study argues that environmental governance increasingly reflects the tensions between sovereign interests, geopolitical fragmentation, economic nationalism, and the urgent need for coordinated responses to global ecological threats. The paper analyses how International Environmental Law has progressively incorporated flexible and polycentric governance arrangements involving non-state actors, subnational governments, scientific institutions, and transnational networks. Simultaneously, it evaluates the institutional limitations currently affecting the multilateral system, particularly in climate governance. The article sustains that the crisis of multilateralism does not necessarily imply the collapse of international cooperation; rather, it signals a functional reconfiguration of authority, legitimacy, and norm production in global environmental governance. In this scenario, International Environmental Law emerges as a pragmatic and result-oriented branch of law that increasingly relies upon soft law instruments, collaborative governance mechanisms, environmental paradiplomacy, and multi-level regulatory arrangements. This article adopts a qualitative and interdisciplinary methodology based on bibliographical and documentary research. It analyses specialised literature, international legal instruments, and recent studies on International Environmental Law, global governance, and the crisis of multilateralism. The research follows an analytical and descriptive approach focused on the transformation of environmental governance structures. The paper concludes that the future effectiveness of International Environmental Law depends upon the capacity of international institutions and actors to reconcile sovereignty with ecological interdependence, strengthening cooperative frameworks capable of responding to the complex environmental challenges of the twenty-first century.